Download Isaac Vossius (1618–1689), between science and scholarship by Eric Jorink, Dirk Miert PDF

By Eric Jorink, Dirk Miert

Often remembered for his library and for his biblical feedback, Isaac Vossius (1618-1689) performed a vital position within the early glossy eu international of studying. Taking his cue from the not likely bedfellows Joseph Scaliger and Rene Descartes, Vossius released on chronology, biblical feedback, optics, African geography and chinese language civilization, whereas accumulating, annotating and promoting one of many century's most valuable libraries. He used to be appointed an early Fellow of the Royal Society, and moved within the circles which later gave upward thrust to the Academie Royale des Sciences. including Christiaan Huygens, he used to be thought of the Dutch Republic's greatest pupil of nature. during this quantity, quite a number authors examine Vossius' participation within the complete spectrum of the Republic of Letters, a lot of which has unfortunately been written out of the historical past of either scholarship and technological know-how. individuals contain: Anthony Grafton, Scott Mandelbrote, Fokko Jan Dijksterhuis, Karel Davids, Thijs Weststeijn, Colette Nativel, Susan Derksen and Astrid C. Balsem

Show description

Read Online or Download Isaac Vossius (1618–1689), between science and scholarship PDF

Similar nature & ecology books

The explorer's guide to Death Valley National Park

Within the fall of 1994, dying Valley nationwide Park turned the fifty-third park to be additional to the U. S. park approach. Spanning greater than 3 million acres, demise Valley is the most important park within the contiguous usa and contours a stunningly varied array of typical sights. The Explorer’s advisor to dying Valley nationwide Park is the 1st whole guidebook to be had for this extraordinary sector.

A Guide to the Knobstone Trail: Indiana's Longest Footpath (Indiana Natural Science)

Essentially the most attractive footpaths within the nation, the Knobstone path deals a spectacularly rugged, 58-mile trek via 40,000 acres of forested land in southern Indiana. A accomplished advisor to this scenic footpath, A consultant to the Knobstone path presents readers with all they should understand to make the simplest of mountaineering this hard path.

Captured: The Animal within Culture

In 2008 a clip used to be published on YouTube which turned a world sensation. The clip, often called the Christian the Lion reunion, confirmed an emotional reunion among males and a lion. they'd bought the lion cub at Harrods in London, saved him as a puppy, then rehomed him in Kenya on George Adamson's Kora Reserve.

Extra info for Isaac Vossius (1618–1689), between science and scholarship

Example text

18 dirk van miert The idea underlying this family tree is that Isaac Vossius first of all inherited the philological methodology of Casaubon, Scaliger and Saumaise, that is: an interest in editions on the basis of a type research on manuscripts which would later, through scholars like Karl Lachmann (1793– 1851) come to be known as ‘stemmatic’. Secondly, Vossius also inherited their fields of interest: a youthful interest in poetry, gradually giving way to more peripheral genres: geography and chronology.

La. 1696) and of notes made on that manuscript by Richard Thomson. Thomson must have made these notes during his stay in Heidelberg, where he was for six months from October 1592 (personal communication of Dr Paul Botley (University of Warwick), who is currently doing research on Thomson). Vossius must have known about this manuscript. Perhaps Gruter had shown the codex to Saumaise, and Saumaise told Vossius about it. from casaubon and scaliger, via saumaise, to vossius 25 with Scaliger’s dealings with the poet.

79 Throughout his emendationes et notae, Saumaise relied heavily on the Palatine manuscript, comparing it with Casaubon’s edition and the edition from Milan. On page 171, he refuted an argument from Casaubon with the help of a passage in Scaliger’s commentary on Eusebius. Casaubon’s emendations, to which Saumaise referred on virtually every page of his commentary, were added to the edition. A work such as this is not to be found in the output of Isaac Vossius, although Vossius later in life did study the same text, if only with an aim to refuting Saumaise’s conclusions, as will be shown in the letter cited below.

Download PDF sample

Rated 4.71 of 5 – based on 40 votes